Thoughts on Choosing a Shared Mobility Software Vendor

Categories

SaaS (software as a service) permeates our lives and businesses. Do you use Dropbox to share files? Have you played around with various to-do list apps? (try TeuxDeux; it’s my favorite). Utilize a point-of-sale system for taking payments from customers? Pay for Evernote Premium? You’re a customer of SaaS vendors. Not all vendors are huge faceless entities. Small specialty software firms may provide you or your business with a product that will require fairly constant interaction between vendor and customer: reporting bugs, requesting configuration changes, or new functionality requests. You may someday find yourself in a position to choose between software vendors offering similar services. The process of choosing a vendor might seem harrowing, and I am writing today to lend some insight to help. No matter your industry, my aim is to help you choose a tech provider you’ll be able to live with (and perhaps even enjoy working with).

Why might my observations be useful? I’ve thought a lot about this for the past five or so years…

Thanks to a dramatic and sudden restructuring of my then-employer, in mid-2008 I found myself largely responsible for managing the technology component of that organization. Having no experience aside from being a mere end user of software before that time, my duties consisted mostly of learning how to coherently report bugs and more urgently, how to successfully pester my account executive at our SaaS provider to fix said bugs. I got to know managers at other organizations who used the same software provider and learned on the fly about managing user groups, writing specs, and how to describe a business problem. Things were not rosy: tension characterized the customers’ interactions with the software vendor: miscommunications, unhappiness about growing bug lists or untended feature requests, and there was an excess of pessimism bordering on mistrust.

A couple years and jobs later I wound up working for the same software vendor I was once a customer of. Because of my history, a constant tenet of my job was to foster productive and positive communication with licensees of the software. The tension with customers was still there, but of course now I saw it from the vendor’s perspective: urgent requests for complex features for projects that were tangential to customers’ core businesses, borderline-trivial bugs eliciting panic, and unmet [unrealistic] expectations from both sides. Despite my efforts that lingering pessimism characterized many interactions.

 As Sandra mentioned on Monday, lots of collaboration takes place between parties regarding car sharing technology.   Through my interactions with colleagues, customers, and other technology partners and a lot of soul-searching, I’ve slowly come to identify the root of this problem:

Misaligned business values between customer and vendor.

It’s as simple as that. Not easy to fix, but simple to express.

By misaligned values, I mean the really big picture. How can the customer/licensee successfully pick a SaaS vendor with whom they’ll not constantly engage in a power struggle? How can software vendors seek out customers who will happily use their software and provide the constructive feedback that is needed?  I believe this has absolutely nothing to do with the software itself, outside of the most macro and obvious factors.

What to look for?

Risk tolerance in this context is the balance of innovation versus stability.  This can also be described as tolerance for discomfort. Would you prefer that functionality stays the same and keeps working in the way you expect it to?  Or would you trade more frequent bugs or down time in exchange for frequent new features?  There’s a reason why software in some industries is not dynamic.  Some banking mainframes haven’t changed much since the 1980s because the risk of new functions possibly failing is far greater than the improvements those new functions will deliver.   Here’s another example from the health insurance industry.  Generally, a conservative and slower-moving organization will not work well with a dynamic and quick-acting organization.  There’s no right answer for this trade-off; know your boundaries and communicate them!

The vendor’s service philosophy will affect your organization every day.  In my opinion, this goes far beyond SLAs (support level agreements) and is more about the vendor’s attitude toward licensees.  Does your organization need a lot of configuration changes (perhaps for marketing purposes)?  Does your pricing fluctuate seasonally or even more frequently?  Are you not very tech-savvy and find that you have a lot of technical questions about the product you’ve licensed?  With a patient and customer-focused technical support team, it’ll be a pleasure to contact your vendor, not a chore.

Exit strategy talk is tricky to navigate. Organizations generally won’t go shouting their buyout aspirations when looking to pen a new contract with a vendor or licensee. It costs vendors and licensees a lot of money and time if their partner is bought out before the contract terms are up.    This might be obvious advice, but don’t allow your contract expiration date to pass and move you to month-to-month if you’re looking to continue business as usual.  Write in clauses that provide for your financial stability in case of a buyout.  In short:  if you are unsure of your negotiating partner’s intentions but otherwise would like to do business with them, ensure you protect yourself with appropriate negotiation goals.

This post has been perhaps overly focused on mitigating the negative aspects of business partnerships.  Something simple and positive that all parties should keep in mind:  for the most part, everyone simply wants to do a good job at their work.  Rarely does anyone come to their partners with purposeful gall or desire to be difficult, though if it happens a few times it’s easy to fall into the rut of negativity.  Whenever possible, pick up the phone or open your video editor of choice and have a real conversation about the issue with your vendor or customer.  Chances are they’ll be glad to talk and truly collaborate with you to solve the problem.

What else would you suggest in evaluating a new business partner?

Related Reading

MaaS

No MaaS. No Multimodality.

Previously, movmi looked at transportation plans from 20 municipalities across Europe and North America and found how MaaS can be designed and tailored to suit the needs of small and big municipalities. In an effort to make access to alternative mobility modes as easy, are MaaS platforms able to strike a balance between mobility service providers (MSPs) and end users? While changing behaviour cannot be achieved without a truly user-centric seamless approach, are business interests of MSPs being considered enough?

In this article we explain how MaaS:

1. Creates a reliable, seamless multimodal user experience.

2. Improves visibility for MSPs in a sea of options available to users.

3. Ultimately increases alternatives for the users and create a rewarding ecosystem for existing and new MSPs to offer the best of their services towards a multimodal future.

Read More »
electric carsharing whitepaper

Electric Carsharing Whitepaper, 2021

The EV industry is maturing at a fast rate to improve vehicle and charging technology. Conservative and overly restrictive policies only prove to hinder innovation. Policies that easily adapt to and foster innovation can help bridge the operational gaps that can ultimately make the mass transition to EVs more feasible. In this whitepaper, we take a deep dive into electric carsharing: user experience, electric vehicles policies, operational feasibility and charging infrastructure. We also analyse EV policies from 9 different cities and scan the top carsharing favoring cities worldwide to understand what has helped and what other factors need to be considered in order to truly electrify carsharing.

Read More »
mobiag

Partner Spotlight: Interview with João Félix, Founder and CEO of Mobiag

This month, movmi’s Venkatesh Gopal chats with João Félix, Founder and CEO at Mobiag – a shared mobility technology pioneer powering free-floating, round-trip and station-based car-sharing, car rental, and scooter-sharing businesses around the globe. Their tools – the latest hardware for numerous vehicle models, customizable mobile apps for iOS and Android, and open SAAS with dynamic third party integrations – are robust and flexible, empowering businesses to implement their innovative business and operational models.

Read More »

Financial Fridays: Bringing Carsharing to Properties

For the fifth session of our Financial Fridays series this year, movmi is joined by Thomas Martin, Director of Business Development at SWTCH, Judith Häberli, Co-Founder and CEO at Urban Connect AG and Galina Russell, Senior Vice President at REEF. In this webinar, the panel discusses bringing carshare (especially EVs) to your property.

Read More »
5 climate change success stories

5 Climate Change Success Stories

Change does not usually happen overnight, especially within the transportation sector. Our vision of a sustainable transportation eco-system, significantly reducing GHG emissions and effectively turning the tide on climate change, just isn’t progressing as fast as we would like and this can be disheartening.

However, we have seen climate change success stories over the last few years, that have given us hope and the encouragement to continue working to reduce GHG emissions and to fight climate change.

Read More »

E-Learning Course “Shared Mobility 101”  AVAILABLE NOW!